|
Home Depot skimps on gifts
Corporate citizen
donates, but peers are more generous
Home Depot skimps
on gifts
Corporate citizen
donates, but peers are more generous
By MATT KEMPNER
The Atlanta
Journal-Constitution
Published on:
10/16/05
Corporate generosity, Home Depot CEO
Bob Nardelli told Business Week magazine
this year, is "just the right thing to
do."
A company's civic work, he said in
another interview published by The New
York Times, can increase sales and
provide a public relations boost. "But
that's not why we do it," he said. "It's
about showing corporate responsibilty."
|
.
Levette Bagwell/AJC |
And as a recent
member of President Bush's Council
on Service and Civic Participation,
Nardelli went out his way to push
other companies to do more.
All of that —
along with press releases and
advertising that tout the company's
generosity — has helped Home Depot
build on an image for charity
fostered by Nardelli's predecessors
and two of Georgia's best-known
philanthropists: Home Depot founders
Bernie Marcus and Arthur Blank. |
|
Civic work is 'about showing
corporate responsibility,' Home
Depot CEO Bob Nardelli told The New
York Times. However, the company's
giving, falls short of corporate
averages.
|
Yet Home Depot's strong reputation
for giving may be misleading when it
comes to dollars and cents. Georgia's
most profitable public company and the
nation's second-largest retailer gives
away a much smaller share of its profits
than its big business peers, and lags
several other major Atlanta companies.
An examination of Home Depot's
philanthropy shows:
• The $35.5 million the company says
it gave in philanthropy last year
amounts to less than five-hundredths of
1 percent of Home Depot's $73.1 billion
in annual sales. That equates to someone
with a $100,000 salary donating less
than $50 a year to charity.
• Home Depot gave about half as much
as Coca-Cola did last year, though the
retailer generated more than three times
Coke's revenue. And while Home Depot had
double the revenue of UPS, it gave about
$4.4 million less than the Sandy
Springs-based delivery company.
• Wal-Mart, the No. 1 retailer whose
reputation has been sullied by
complaints that it is stingy with
workers and suppliers, outgives Home
Depot. The Arkansas-based company gave
away about three times the share of
pre-tax profit that Home Depot did last
year.
• Home Depot falls short even by the
measure it helped develop so that
business leaders could compare their
corporations' giving with others. Using
that measuring stick — giving as a
percentage of pre-tax profit — Home
Depot donated about one-third of what
the typical large corporation gave. And
that was in 2004, a brutal year of
hurricanes that prompted Home Depot to
donate more than it usually does.
• Of six big public companies in
metro Atlanta whose charitable giving
was analyzed, only one company donated a
smaller percentage of pre-tax profit
than Home Depot: BellSouth. The
telecommunications com-
pany has a more regional focus than
Home Depot, and generates less than
one-third its revenues.
Though Home Depot lags many others in
monetary giving, Nardelli promotes his
company's big heart.
"Taking care of our people and giving
back to the community are at the core of
our corporate values and is a
responsibility as well as a business
strategy," he wrote in a newsletter for
a business group stressing philanthropic
giving.
Nardelli declined to be interviewed
for this article and directed inquiries
to the company's public relations staff.
Home Depot spokesman Brad Shaw said he
didn't think the company appeared stingy
compared to other businesses.
"There is always more we can do, and
we are well aware of that," he said. But
a comparison of dollar giving "doesn't
account for a lot of things we are doing
that prove we are very generous."
"I define giving by total impact,
including dollars and sweat equity,"
Shaw said. In particular, Home Depot has
"one of the most robust and effective
volunteer programs in the country."
Home Depot's organized approach
encouraged workers to volunteer about 2
million hours last year, including time
building playgrounds and fixing homes,
according to the company. The retailer
won a national Points of Light
Foundation award earlier this year for
volunteerism.
Still, Home Depot doesn't go as far
with its program as some employers. Many
big U.S. corporations donate extra money
to nonprofit groups if employees
volunteer for a certain number of hours.
Some businesses allow employees to
volunteer on company time. Home Depot
does neither, though it pays one
employee in each store up to two hours a
week to organize volunteer events.
Sophia Muirhead questions whether
Home Depot should take credit for the
work employees perform away from the
store.
"If they are volunteering on their
own time, should [Home Depot] be taking
credit for that?" asked Muirhead, who
reports on corporate giving for The
Conference Board, a New York-based
nonprofit that does business research.
Michelle Nunn, chief executive of the
Atlanta-based Hands On Network, said
Home Depot deserves credit for strongly
supporting its employees' volunteer work
and called the efforts "highly
laudable." Hands On Network organizes
volunteers nationally, and Nardelli
chairs its advisory board.
An image payoff
Businesses aren't required to give to
charity. And there are some, including
Nobel Prize-winning economist Milton
Friedman, who think corporations instead
should pass the money on to shareholders
and let them make their own decisions
about how to spend it.
Still, many companies — Home Depot
included — say giving is part of their
business strategy. They highlight their
contributions in advertisements, press
releases and annual social
responsibility reports.
The emphasis makes sense, says Carol
Cone, chairman of Boston-based Cone
Inc., which specializes in helping
companies with their giving image. Her
firm commissions an annual telephone
survey on consumer attitudes about
corporate social responsibility.
"Nobody goes to a company just
because it is engaged in the community,"
she said. More important for a business
are the quality and price of their
products and services, the employee
benefits they offer or how well they
abide by laws and regulations, according
to Cone's 2004 survey of 1,033 people.
But in an ad-crowded world of
competing companies, a corporation's
reputation for social responsibility
holds growing importance, she said.
Eighty-six percent of those polled
said they were likely to switch to a
brand associated with a cause if it was
about the same price and quality of
competing brands. And more than 80
percent said a company's commitment to a
social issue was important in deciding
where to work and which companies they
wanted to see doing business in their
communities.
The survey also showed that 70
percent consider the trait important in
their decisions about which stock to
buy. Others see benefits for employee
morale.
"This is no longer a nice-to-do; this
is a have-to-do," Cone said.
Nardelli acknowledges the need for a
company to be generous with its giving.
"I think recent events throughout
corporate America would illustrate that
you definitely pay a price when you
don't pay your civic dues," he said in
The New York Times story. "Having some
goodwill in the bank based on real
efforts in your communities might at
least earn you some benefit of the doubt
when you otherwise might not get it."
Competitive giving
How much should a company give away
if it wants to be known for its social
responsibility?
"I don't go there," said Charles
Moore, executive director of the
Committee to Encourage Corporate
Philanthropy, a forum of top business
leaders headed by Citigroup Chairman
Sanford Weill. "It's why they give and
how they give that is important, as
opposed to how much they give."
Nonetheless, one of the New
York-based committee's biggest
undertakings was setting up a way to
allow member companies to measure and
compare how much money they give away in
relation to their peers. One reason:
"There is a competitive context in
corporate philanthropy," Moore said.
The committee doesn't publicly
disclose comparisons or rankings of the
giving levels of specific members, but
it does report combined results of its
surveys. In an interview for this
article, Home Depot, which belongs to
the committee and helped set up the
measurement system, conceded that the
data confirm that it gives a smaller
percentage of pre-tax income than do
other big businesses.
Last year, Home Depot gave away less
than one half of 1 percent of its $7.9
billion pre-tax profit, or .45 percent.
That contrasts with a median of 1.3
percent of pre-tax profits donated by 71
members surveyed by the Committee to
Encourage Corporate Philanthropy. A
separate survey by The Conference Board,
a nonprofit research firm, found that
the median for big companies was 1.01
percent of pre-tax profit.
Companies often give directly to
charity or through foundations, or both.
Home Depot said it primarily gave direct
contributions, but its figures also
include amounts it gave to its
foundation, which also receives funding
from the retailer's vendors.
The Committee to Encourage Corporate
Philanthropy recommends that giving
programs "should grow in proportion to
increases in corporate profitability."
But Home Depot's giving as a
percentage of pre-tax profit has dipped
during Nardelli's reign, which began in
late 2000. It dropped from an average of
.46 of a percentage point for the
four-year period pre-Nardelli to .39
during the most recent four years of his
tenure.
Even under former leaders Marcus and
Blank — men well known for their
personal giving — Home Depot donated
less than other big businesses.
Kim Shreckengost, a former Home Depot
executive who has worked with Blank for
years, said her boss looked at Home
Depot's giving as a total package that
included personal giving by himself and
Marcus.
"I don't think anyone can dispute
Arthur and Bernie's generosity," she
said. She discourages comparisons with
giving by other companies. "It wasn't a
competition."
It's difficult to compare Home
Depot's giving with archrival Lowe's. A
Lowe's spokeswoman declined to disclose
what the chain gives, only providing the
figure Lowe's publicizes — $22.5 million
last year, which it says includes money
donated by vendors and customers.
Still, this much is clear: Compared
to the median giving by big businesses
overall, Lowe's — like Home Depot — fell
short, even though Lowe's was boosted by
the money donated by customers and
vendors.
Good reputation
Home Depot declines to give a
breakdown of how much it gives annually
to each of its nonprofit beneficiaries.
But it makes clear that it gives
heavily to the American Red Cross — with
which it has a three-year, $6.6 million
partnership to promote disaster
preparedness — and KaBOOM, a nonprofit
that builds playgrounds for communities.
Earlier this year, Home Depot announced
it would work on 1,000 playgrounds over
the next three years.
The company also highlights its
programs to employ Olympic hopefuls. And
it issued a press release about its
commitment to donate $2.5 million in
cash for relief and rebuilding efforts
after Hurricane Katrina — money that
will go to the American Red Cross, the
Salvation Army and others.
The giving helps more than just the
nonprofits. It helps Home Depot.
In a 2004 study of the reputations of
some of the nation's most visible
corporations, Home Depot looked good to
Americans surveyed. In the area of
social responsibility, the Atlanta-based
retailer ranked eighth out of 60 big
companies in the survey by The
Reputation Institute, which is run by a
former business professor from New York
University. Coca-Cola was No. 1 in terms
of perceived social responsibility — a
position Home Depot enjoyed four years
earlier. The segment includes supporting
good causes, being environmentally
responsive and behaving responsibly in
the communities in which it operates.
Not all reputations match what
corporations are actually doing, said
Charles Fombrun, the executive director
of The Reputation Institute.
"There is a gap that develops
sometimes between reality and
perception," he said.
How has Home Depot managed to look so
good without giving money at the same
rate as other big companies?
Cone, whose company surveys consumers
on corporate good works, said Home Depot
had built much of its reputation through
years of focused giving in areas that
fit snugly with its core business —
helping rebuild after storms and
improving housing. The company's stores
and employees provide an effective way
for Home Depot to communicate those
efforts, she said. And she cited
memorable TV advertising by the retailer
showing a Home Depot delivery truck
changing its route to head toward
gathering storm clouds and people in
need.
Cone, who has worked with Home Depot
but not in recent years, said the
company deservedly retained "an
excellent reputation" for social
responsibility.
While "ideally you like it to be at
the median level" in total dollar
giving, she said, the bigger question
is, "is it effective in terms of its
business and social objectives?"
"I've seen many companies giving a
lot more money and it's not as effective
for reputation building and for the
community," she said.
GIVING LEVELS BY HOME DEPOT
|
Fiscal |
Pre-tax |
Total |
Giving as a
share |
|
Year |
profit |
giving |
of pre-tax
profit** |
|
2004* |
$7.91 billion |
$35.5 million |
.45 percent |
|
2003 |
$6.84 billion |
$24.7 million |
.36 percent |
|
2002 |
$5.87 billion |
$21.2 million |
.36 percent |
|
2001 |
$4.96 billion |
$19.4 million |
.39 percent |
|
2000 |
$4.22 billion |
$18.0 million |
.43 percent |
|
1999 |
$3.80 billion |
$15.0 million |
.39 percent |
|
1998 |
$2.65 billion |
$12.5 million |
.47 percent |
|
1997 |
$1.90 billion |
$10.3 million |
.54 percent |
|
1996 |
$1.54 billion |
$9.0 million |
.59 percent |
|
1995 |
$1.20 billion |
$7.0 million |
.59 percent |
*Home Depot says 2004 was an
unusually heavy giving year for it as it
responded to several hurricanes in
Florida.
**Numbers affected by rounding
Source: Home Depot, AJC analysis of Home
Depot's filings with the SEC.
COMPARING HOME DEPOT'S GIVING IN
2004
|
|
Pre-tax |
Total |
Giving as a
share |
|
Company |
profit |
giving |
of pre-tax
profit** |
|
Home Depot |
$7.91 billion |
$35.5 million |
.45 percent |
|
UPS |
$4.92 billion |
$41.2 million |
.84 percent |
|
Coca-Cola |
$6.22 billion |
$67.2 million |
1.08 percent |
|
BellSouth |
$5.19 billion |
$19.2 million |
.37 percent |
|
Georgia-Pacific |
$923 million |
$6.3 million |
.68 percent |
|
Coca-Cola
Enterprises+ |
$972 million |
$14.0 million |
1.44 percent |
|
Delta Air
Lines* |
-NA- |
$12.0 million |
-NA- |
• 1.3 percent: Median for 71
large companies (including Home Depot)
from the Committee to Encourage
Corporate Philanthropy
• 1.01 percent: Survey of large
companies by The Conference Board *Delta
had no profit in 2004
**Numbers affected by rounding
# BellSouth's pre-tax profit and giving
figures do not include results or giving
from Cingular.
+All Coca-Cola Enterprises figures are
for the year 2003. Giving figures for
2004 are not available.
Source: The companies and organizations,
AJC analysis of company filings with the
SEC filing
© 2005 The Atlanta
Journal-Constitution
Link (Very Long URL)
|